Re: Insane Legal System - was SR22 Crash



Dave J wrote:
Engineers can do nothing without clients. Therefore, all structural
failures are the result of the folks that hired the engineers to design
the structure, right?
No - neither of those are reasonable analogies.
They are identical analogies. Your assertion was simply ludicrous.

No, they're not. A more fitting analogy, would be to a gun. As we have
all heard many times, "guns don't kill people, people kill people."
Regardless of whether you're a fan of that statement, I think the
logic matches well with lawyers and their clients -- to a degree.

Really? I've never had any of my guns talk to me and suggest I go out and shoot someone. Lawyers are all the time trying to talk clients into hiring them to sue someone. Bzzt! Please try again.


To make your engineering analogy work, a better story would be the
client who specifically asked an engineer to design the building so
cheaply that it would start to fall to pieces shortly after his client
had sold it. [ As an aside, most engineers are members of associations
like IEEE or ASME that do have ethics codes that would prohibit
this. ]

Again, this only holds if the engineer suggested to the client that they hire the engineer to design such a building. Again, I don't think this happens much in the engineering profession (I am an engineer), but it happens all of the time with lawyers. I see several TV ads EVERY time I watch TV that encourage people to do exactly this.


Most lawyerly behavior is not really immoral so much as it is amoral.
They do their job, which is very clearly defined as serving their
clients. It's an issue that has been discussed at length by attorneys
over the ages, but in the US system, courts are adversarial: the
lawyer's job is zealously represent his client. He has no
responsibility to "truth" or "social benefit," etc. (I understand that
European courts are more fact-finding and solution-seeking than
American. Typically, European judges, for example, take a more
proactive stance in managing cases than in the US, where the judge
just plays referee.)

Now, lawyers, unlike guns are people, so should have some personal
sense of right and wrong, but they also have a responsibility to do
their jobs well. It puts them in a bit of a gray area.

Bingo. This is why your analogy to guns is so stupid and wrong.


I agree with most here that the lawsuits on aircraft companies for
crashes that are not their fault are deeply, deeply, problematic, I
don't think the solution is killing the lawyers or making them somehow
more "moral." (And of course, there's the little question of who's
morality are we talking about?)

For the record, I've never advocated killing lawyers, nor would I ever. However, I do advocate a loser and loser's lawyer pays system more akin to what exists in parts of Europe.

Matt
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: What does "project manager" mean to you?
    ... I function as 1 part assisting the design department head ... Often I'll help, as much as the design team seems to need, with MY ... engineer and draftsmen then 'flesh it out'. ... bookkeeper and part client rep. ...
    (sci.engr.civil)
  • Senior Electrical Design Engineer
    ... Senior Electrical Design Engineer - Dubai/Abu Dhabi ... Senior Electrical Engineer- Dubai - TAX FREE!!! ... Our client is an international, multi-disciplinary, engineering and ... Electrical Engineer to work in their Building Services team. ...
    (uk.jobs.offered)
  • Staff HW Engineer ~ Lead Us to ATCA & Beyond in Your End-to-End Board-Level HW Desig
    ... The senior level hardware engineer looking for the product realization ... and true ownership that comes with full end-to-end board-level hardware ... help us retain dominance in the design of high performance switching ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Slowing TL acquisition while allowing interstellar scope
    ... An Operator of equipment does not necessarily have to know how the equipment does what it does, just that pressing buttons, throwing levers, or otherwise manipulating what ever human interface there is will accomplish said task. ... A repair person does not necessarily have to know all of the design functions, nor be skilled in operation OTHER than being able to operate the equipment sufficiently to assess the point of failure, and after maintenance, whether or not the equipment is operating within performance spec. ... The design engineer, on the other hand, must be able to evaluate whether or not the equipment in the design process will meet the performance spec - which means that he MUST be able foresee and understand the operational parameters, possible points of failure, and required maintenance. ...
    (rec.games.frp.gurps)
  • Re: A Challenge for Stewart Pinkerton
    ... amplifier design, ... actually a tube group, and you are a very clever engineer, I challenge you ... But, Ivy, my old darling, we don't *need* a favour. ...
    (rec.audio.tubes)