Re: Stepping back from ANR
- From: "Roger (K8RI)" <ValidAddress@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 14:25:05 -0400
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:22:41 +0100, NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:19:11 -0400, Roger <GetValidAddress@xxxxxx><snip>
wrote:
I've been looking at headsets recently and came to the conclusion that
the QFR XCC clone is a good compromise at $240. Compared to other ANR
headsets it has some of the highest passive attenuation though only
~10db electronic. If the electronics fail it should still be very
good.
By the way Roger you mentioned in a previous post that 3db was
half/double. I think you're still thinking of power not volts.
I assume ANR refers to volts so think 6db = half/double, or am I
getting rusty with all this?
Sound (and our hearing) is logarithmic so I'm pretty sure that the 3
db holds for sound as it does for power.
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
David
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stepping back from ANR
- From: NOSPAM
- Re: Stepping back from ANR
- References:
- Re: Stepping back from ANR
- From: Roger
- Re: Stepping back from ANR
- From: NOSPAM
- Re: Stepping back from ANR
- Prev by Date: Re: Why don't voice radio communications use FM?
- Next by Date: Re: No more "Left Downwind"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Stepping back from ANR
- Next by thread: Re: Stepping back from ANR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|