Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- From: Martin Hotze <governor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:59:28 +0200
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:30:24 -0500, "Jim Macklin"
<p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote:
so why
should the USA grant them a sanctuary?
the USA has nothing to do there. No _actual_ threat, no declaration of war
from Iran, no attack from Iran, nothing - according to international law
that would justify an invasion (by US troops). Ah well .. wait a minute ..
you never gave sh*t on international law.
#m
Yes, I agree they (Iran) should be more cooperative etc.
--
"We're out of toilet paper sir!"
<http://www.webcrunchers.com/crunch/Play/history/stories/toilet.html>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- From: LWG
- Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- From: Jim Macklin
- Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- References:
- MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- From: John
- Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- From: Jim Macklin
- Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- From: Bob Fry
- MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone seen "Flight 93" yet?
- Next by Date: Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- Previous by thread: Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- Next by thread: Re: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|