Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: "Dudley Henriques" <dhenriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:04:36 GMT
"Roy Smith" <roy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:roy-BBFA55.08030828022006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dudley Henriques" <dhenriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It could happen and did. Engine loss on a rear engine twin can be very
deceiving, and it doesn't have to be a complete failure either.
I would think it would be easy (at least from the engineering perspective)
to display a big red warning light when the RPMs of the two engines differ
by more than a certain percent. Did the 337 have anything like that?
Ours didn't. Steam gauges only. EGT was the primary monitor on takeoff.
Dudley Henriques
.
- References:
- Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: Dallas
- Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: Darkwing
- Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: john smith
- Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: Dudley Henriques
- Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: Jim Macklin
- Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: Matt Whiting
- Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: Dudley Henriques
- Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- From: Roy Smith
- Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- Next by Date: Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- Next by thread: Re: Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|