Re: Turbulence and airspeed
- From: gyoung <gyoung@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:09:09 -0500
I have a problem with most of the answers posted here because I don't think they reflect the physics of flight.
First, tho', here's the way I picture turbulence.
Turbulence occurs when an aircraft moves from a volume of air moving at a certain velocity into air moving at a different velocity, and the transition from one volume of air into the other occurs quickly. It is important to look at velocity as the combination of speed -and- direction relative to some reference system. (It is helpful to me to use a reference system external to the airplane.) So, turbulence may be caused by updrafts and downdrafts (vertical movement of a body of air relative to the air surrounding it), or by rapid changes in horizontal velocity (like the 'swirling air' or 'burbling air' that others have described).
Another situation in which an airplane may be 'tossed around" is when one part of the airplane (say the left wing) is in a body of air that is moving at a different velocity than another part of the aircraft (say the right wing). Such differentials in velocity aren't likely to exist for a very long time over such short distances, so they cause a form of turbulence. So let's say the left wing goes into an updraft, passes through it quickly, then returns to air that is moving the same velocity as the right wing; the aircraft will jerk towards the right.
Now to other explanations of the airspeed question: One principle I believe applies is the First Law of Physics" - "Conservation of Energy" (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy"). In level flight, and at a constant power setting, an aircraft whose airspeed is disturbed -will return- to the airspeed at which it was flying before the disturbance. The return to that airspeed will be delayed by the time required to accelerate (or decelerate) until the thrust (power) matches drag. The amount of time required will be related to the mass of the airplane and the difference between power produced by the engine (thrust) and the drag of the aircraft.
In the short span of time during which the aircraft moves from air moving at the first velocity to the second, the velocity of the air relative to the aircraft (angle of attack and/or yaw) will change abruptly, the occupants will feel 'turbulence', and the aircraft will find itself in a different flight condition. But assuming there isn't another change in the airmass velocity surrounding the aircraft (or a change in power setting or trim), it will return to the same flight attitude as before the change. When there are repeated, frequent changes in airmass velocity, it will be difficult to observe the effect, but it -is- a Law of Physics.
As for the proposed explanations that address the pitot/static system: Once the aircraft has returned to the original airspeed, and assuming there were no changes in power, trim, or significant change in gross weight, the plane will be going through the air at the same angle as before the 'perturbation' - it will be flying at the same angles of attack and of yaw. So the air pressure sources will be seeing the same air as before which should result in the same readings on the instruments.
But back to Jay's question: What might explain why airspeed increased in turbulence? Here's another idea - a phenomenon described in the April/May 2005 issue of Air & Space Smithsonian, an article that discusses flying sailplanes and an phenomenon they call "dynamic soaring". I really don't understand it well, but it seems to be that one can 'gain energy' for the 'aircraft system' by "exposing the airplane's belly to stronger winds" for brief periods of time, flying back into winds not so strong, returning to the stronger winds, and going back and forth. So, I guess the airplane extracts some energy from the stronger winds (weakening them I assume), and uses that energy to go faster (or in the case of sailplanes, stay aloft longer). What do you think?
George Young
T-34, Comanche, C-182/172/152, Mooney, and Arrow pilot
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Turbulence and airspeed
- From: Private
- Re: Turbulence and airspeed
- References:
- Turbulence and airspeed
- From: Jay Honeck
- Turbulence and airspeed
- Prev by Date: Re: Daley whining (again) for his ADIZ
- Next by Date: Re: Turbulence and airspeed
- Previous by thread: Re: Turbulence and airspeed
- Next by thread: Re: Turbulence and airspeed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading