Re: Bose Aviation-X Headset Update
- From: "Peter R." <pjricc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:50:17 -0500
Jose <teacherjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If so, the
> praise belongs more to ANR than to BOSE, IMHO, though I will concur that
> the clamping is less with headsets that provide low passive reduction.
IMO, it's not just the ANR capabilities of the Bose, it is also the
comfort. But I certainly agree that one man's comfort is another man's
pain, thanks to varied head sizes, so comfort is very subjective.
I have about 500 hours with my Bose Aviation X, including a thirteen hour
trip across the US (NY to CA), and I am still very happy with the headsets.
No problems at all except for worn ear pads.
This contrasts starkly with my experience in owning a Lightspeed headset,
but no need to walk down that path again.
--
Peter
.
- References:
- Re: Bose Aviation-X Headset Update
- From: Jose
- Re: Bose Aviation-X Headset Update
- Prev by Date: site from NG
- Next by Date: Re: Find the roof-top logos
- Previous by thread: Re: Bose Aviation-X Headset Update
- Next by thread: Re: Bose Aviation-X Headset Update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
