Re: Angry
- From: "Peter Duniho" <NpOeStPeAdM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:20:28 -0800
"sfb" <sfb@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Qcntf.163$7x.160@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Receipts will be a sea change for vote selling. It doesn't happen much now
> because it is all risk no reward to the buyer who has no way of knowing
> how the seller actually voted.
Um...then the people buying votes are idiots, I guess.
As I already pointed out, absentee ballots are a perfect way to buy votes.
You don't even leave the voting up to the seller. You just get their vote
by proxy, through their absentee ballot.
> A receipt removes all risk guaranteeing the buyer gets what they paid for.
Only for the seller too dumb to use absentee ballots.
> Without receipts, the buyer has to seek out voters in advance. With
> receipts, the buyer just stands outside the polling place and buys a sure
> thing after the vote is cast.
Um, again...idiots? Anyone who stands outside a polling place and offers
money to anyone who just happened to vote the way they wanted, that's an
idiot right there.
"Sea change"? I don't think so.
Pete
.
- References:
- Angry
- From: Hilton
- Re: Angry
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Angry
- From: jacobowitz73
- Re: Angry
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Angry
- From: Larry Dighera
- Re: Angry
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Angry
- From: Robert M. Gary
- Re: Angry
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Angry
- From: Steven P. McNicoll
- Re: Angry
- From: Jose
- Re: Angry
- From: sfb
- Re: Angry
- From: Jose
- Re: Angry
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Angry
- From: Neil Gould
- Re: Angry
- From: sfb
- Re: Angry
- From: Neil Gould
- Re: Angry
- From: Tom Conner
- Re: Angry
- From: Flyingmonk
- Re: Angry
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Angry
- From: Jose
- Re: Angry
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Angry
- From: sfb
- Angry
- Prev by Date: Re: Angry [More Info]
- Next by Date: Re: Angry [More Info]
- Previous by thread: Re: Angry
- Next by thread: Re: Angry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|