Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:48:57 -0800
In article <11mu70cm8394ka5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Peter Duniho" <NpOeStPeAdM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Ron Garret" <rNOSPAMon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:rNOSPAMon-65760A.00502907112005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Well, at least we agree that something on the server side is the root
> > cause of the problem here.
>
> I didn't realize that was ever in disagreement.
>
> >> It doesn't "break" a standard to play a file even when the standard
> >> doesn't
> >> provide sufficient information to play it.
> >
> > A straw man (or perhaps it's a non-sequitur). The standard does provide
> > enough information. What is happening here is that the server is lying
> > about what kind of file it is serving.
>
> It's not a "straw man". You simply misinterpreted my meaning. By "the
> standard doesn't provide sufficient information", all I mean is that the
> instance of the use of the standard doesn't.
Ah, I see we have a fundamental philosophical difference here...
> >> All the media player does is to try to make an educated guess as to what
> >> was
> >> actually intended
> >
> > No, the media player is doing more than that. The media player is
> > *ignoring* the content-type information sent by the server.
>
> As well it should, since that information is erroneous.
>
> I tend to ignore erroneous information as well.
So when your AI flops over you just ignore it? Me, I'd get it fixed.
> Are you saying that you do not?
Absolutely. Erroneous information is almost always an indication of a
problem that needs to be fixed. Just ignoring it can cause real harm.
If I roll up to a fuel pump labelled "100LL" and Jet-A comes out I'd be
pretty upset. But you would just say, "Oh, I guess when they said 100LL
they *meant* Jet-A" and figure that makes it OK.
> > Here's an aviation analogy: imagine that you had a magic gadget that
> > could convert Jet-A to 100LL. You install one of these on your
> > piston-powered airplane. Now when you fill up you can take either Jet-A
> > or 100LL. You no longer care. One day you get to an airport where the
> > pump marked 100LL is in fact dispensing Jet-A. From your point of view
> > this is not a problem. But from everyone else's point of view it is.
> >
> > So... should everyone have to install one of these magic gadgets on
> > their planes? Or are the people without the gadget right to insist that
> > the fuel pumps ought to be marked correctly?
> >
> > That is an exact analogy to the current situation.
>
> No, it's not. Or if it does, it fails to prove your point.
>
> In this current situation, Windows Media Player is the gadget, not the fuel
> dispenser. The incorrectly labeled fuel dispenser is equivalent to the
> server, not the media player.
That's right.
> If you want to complain about anyone, complain about the server serving up
> the incorrect content type information, not the media player that correctly
> figures out how to play the file in spite of that incorrect information.
I am complaining about both. I am complaining about the server as the
root cause of the problem, and about the media player causing a
significant number of people to think that there is no problem and
therefore making it that much less likely that the problem will be fixed.
The problem with the media player is not so much that it plays the
video, but that it does so without providing any indication that there
is a problem. If the player put up a warning message along the lines of
"The server says this is an MP4 file but in fact it is not. This
indicates a problem with the server's configuration. Please notify the
maintainer of this site," before playing the video I would have no
quarrel with it.
What the player is doing is masking (part of) a common-mode failure and
making it appear as if it is not a common-mode failure. IMO, being
complacent about that sort of thing is the first step on the road to
disaster.
rg
.
- References:
- Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Alt Beer
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: JohnH
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Matt Whiting
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Stefan
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Joe Feise
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- From: Peter Duniho
- Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- Prev by Date: Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- Next by Date: Re: IFR system question
- Previous by thread: Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- Next by thread: Re: Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|