Re: Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- From: Larry Dighera <LDighera@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:07:22 GMT
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:15:12 GMT, Chris Kennedy <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in <Qh1We.13662$p%3.58416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>::
>The long aluminum tube places all of the passengers close to the
>longitudinal axis, so that relative displacement of the passenger
>compartment in roll is small.
Agreed.
>The opposite is true of a flying wing
>design, so you end up with crap sliding off seat back trays, drinks
>spilling and other passenger-unfriendly annoyances.
In a _coordinated_ turn, which necessitates a bank, or roll, on
longitudinal axis, there will be no such lateral displacement as you
predict, however, turbulence may produce some if that. If the roll
rate is brisk, there may be some increase in G felt by passengers in
the rising wind, and decrease in G felt by those in the descending
wing, but with today's computerized fly-by-wire control systems, all
these concerns could be largely eliminated in nearly all cases.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- From: Chris Kennedy
- Re: Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- References:
- Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- From: Larry Dighera
- Re: Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- From: Ben Hallert
- Re: Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- From: Larry Dighera
- Re: Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- From: Chris Kennedy
- Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- Prev by Date: Re: why is Vne a TAS?
- Next by Date: Re: Stupid transponder question, or, stumped by the wife
- Previous by thread: Re: Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- Next by thread: Re: Quiet Airliners of the Future?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|