Re: Starting new C172s
- From: toecutter1962@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 03:41:00 GMT
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:30:25 GMT, OP <OLP@xxxxxxx> wrote:
snip
>I had read of this method for starting a hot fuel injected engine,
>but the article I read didn't say anything about which fuel injected
>engines had the return to the tank line. Does this apply to "all"
>fuel injected engines of the Lycoming/Continental types, flat
>four/sixes in all aircraft? I guess my question is... is the vapor
>return line common to all aircraft manufacturers?
The method described (WOT, ICO, boost pump on) is used to clear a TCM
classic fuel injection system, which will have a return line. If the
"aircraft manufacturer" is using an engine/s with this type of fuel
injection, it will have a return line/s. It can be important on some
aircraft to know how many "return lines" are present, and which tank/s
they are connected to.
A RSA/Bendix system will not have a return line. On the airframes that
I am allegedly familiar with, running the boost pump in this manner
will not accomplish much. But if it makes you (collective you) feel
better, go for it.
The typical RSA/Bendix "hot start" issue is not vaporised fuel in the
pump/lines causing a too-lean start, it is the fuel "boiling" out of
the hard injector lines into the engine induction system along with an
over-zealous application of boost pump-throttle-mixture to over-prime
an engine that often doesn't need priming at all.
I've never personally seen a Lycoming with a TCM classic system, but
there are a few TCM's flying around with RSA/Bendix systems.
TC
snip
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: OP
- Re: Starting new C172s
- References:
- Starting new C172s
- From: navghtivs
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: OP
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: Greg Farris
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: OP
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: Mortimer Schnerd, RN
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: john smith
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: Newps
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: Matt Barrow
- Re: Starting new C172s
- From: OP
- Starting new C172s
- Prev by Date: Re: Creation of rec.aviation.politics (Was: Re: OT(?): First 396 Trip - long)
- Next by Date: Re: Flying a Bonanza
- Previous by thread: Re: Starting new C172s
- Next by thread: Re: Starting new C172s
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading