Re: EPA update
- From: "Steve Foley" <steve.foley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:55:00 GMT
Why do you feel entitled to compensation? Bad things happen to good people.
Life isn't fair. Live with it.
It seems that you're angry at the 10% (your figure) pilots who create the
problem, along with the establishment for not resolving what you perceive as
a problem, and have decided to do whatever you can to get even. Swatting
flies with a cannon.
Like I said, you are punishing ME, personally, by taking money from my
pocket to pay for a useless containment system. What do you get from it,
except the satisfaction of 'getting even'?
You've stated that everything you've done is legal. Tell me, is it right?
"Skylune" <longislandsurfer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fc330c6118a1c280db54cc4226da0dc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Well how am I, who bought property about 5 miles from the airport about 15
> years ago, specifically avoiding areas around both runways and in the
> pattern, being compensated for pilots who want to engage in low level
> flying? And for the airport that now means to expand to attract more
> business??
>
> I've gone to the meetings, and met the ridiculous "airport here first
> argument." (Because of their age, almost all airports were there first.
> Does that mean they can expand --with my taxpayer money and commercial
> airline surcharges--without limit?) I have been treated with disdain by
> the airport staff, and in a patronizing way by the moronic airport
> consultant they hired to conduct a public meeting. On the (only three)
> occassions I called to complain about a REALLY low, loud flier, I was
> treated by disdain by the airport staff and the FAA. (Like anyone on the
> ground can get an N number of a plane zoooming about 500 ft overhead....).
> So I got fed up, did my research, and exercised my rights to express my
> opinion. Never broke any laws, threatened, etc.
>
> Everyone knows that voluntary noise abatement is a total joke. Why is it
> that boats, motorcycles, cars, stereos, leaf blowers, barking dogs,
> EVERYTHING, are subject to community noise ordinances except GA? Its true
> that a leaf blower may make more noise up close (not more than the idiot
> Mooney pilot, though). The difference is that my neighbors have respect
> for one another, and we are not anonymous, unlike the looney Mooney pilot
> who was flying every morning before five -- I guess he likes the smooth
> air and how his plane could really rip at that hour......
>
> As far as the EPA regulations, we all must abide by regulations we don't
> necessarily agree with. I didn't write them, and I may not even agree
> with them. Its the EPA that is costing you money on this particular
> issue. And rising fuel prices are taking a toll on everyone.
> Discretionary activities, like flying for pleasure (and most boating),
> will of course take a disproportionate hit.
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: EPA update
- From: Skylune
- Re: EPA update
- References:
- EPA update
- From: Skylune
- Re: EPA update
- From: Aluckyguess
- Re: EPA update
- From: ORVAL FAIRAIRN
- Re: EPA update
- From: Steve Foley
- Re: EPA update
- From: Skylune
- Re: EPA update
- From: Steve Foley
- Re: EPA update
- From: Skylune
- EPA update
- Prev by Date: Re: TAF KNBG
- Next by Date: Re: EPA update
- Previous by thread: Re: EPA update
- Next by thread: Re: EPA update
- Index(es):