Re: OT: Hitler and Guns

On Dec 14, 10:10 pm, tankfixer <paul.carr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <96bc297f-2a42-4c66-9b43-dfff270cfea0
@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx says...





On Dec 14, 6:22 pm, tankfixer <paul.carr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
Yeah, there was no reason to poison Eva Braun, and no reason
for Gobbles to kill his wife and kids. After a couple of years they
would have likely had an ability to resume a fairly normal life, as
I rather doubt there was any motive on the part of the allies to harm
women and children just cuz their old boy was a prick, at least none
that I know of.
Ken

The British, French or American's would have treated the wife and
children decently.
The Soviets would have found a mine shaft if they stayed true to form.

Ahh, where do you get the idea Soviets deliberately abused
women and children (apart from the demands of war)? A ref please.
Ken

Might I direct yoru attention to Nicholas and his late family...

Good point, that's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Revolution_(1917)#Death_of_the_imperial_family
history is complex, I find no specific Soviet order to kill Nicolas et
al,
though these guys apparently did so,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshevik

But we're directing our attention to Soviet policy in WW2.

Do you want to examine US gov policy toward injuns in the 1800's?
I don't.
Ken
.

Relevant Pages