Re: It Doesn't Fly, It's Just So Ugly It Repels the Ground
- From: Rob Arndt <teuton263@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 30, 7:42�pm, Matthew G. Saroff <msaroff2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Which aircraft most fits the category for you?
I've thought the F-4 Phantom as the apotheosis of this class,
though the F-16 is pretty ugly too.
--
� --Matthew Saroff
Rules to live by:
� 1) To thine own self be true
� 2) Don't let your mouth write no checks that your *** can't cash
� 3) Interference in the time stream is forbidden, do not meddle in causality
Checkhttp://www.pobox.com/~msaroff, including The Bad Hair Web Page
Any French bomber of WW2 ;)
BTW, the F-word in aviation has to be Farman...
Rob
.
- References:
- It Doesn't Fly, It's Just So Ugly It Repels the Ground
- From: Matthew G . Saroff
- It Doesn't Fly, It's Just So Ugly It Repels the Ground
- Prev by Date: It Doesn't Fly, It's Just So Ugly It Repels the Ground
- Next by Date: Re: Best fighter to never see combat 1950-1990
- Previous by thread: It Doesn't Fly, It's Just So Ugly It Repels the Ground
- Next by thread: Re: It Doesn't Fly, It's Just So Ugly It Repels the Ground
- Index(es):