Re: Raptor finally drops a bomb so small it can carry it.

Rob Arndt wrote:
On Sep 28, 1:38?pm, papajohn <f...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:29:26 -0500, Dan <B2...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Ed Rasimus wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:15:40 -0500, Dan <B2...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Ed Rasimus wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:40:19 -0700, Rob Arndt <teuton...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snip>
Let's see if it even lives up to being an air superiority fighter
first, eh?
So far so good.
Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
www.thunderchief.org
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
Is it too much to hope for xenia/rob/jon/watch-this-space to ever
understand the concept of air superiority? I have tried explaining it to
her.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Dan, I learned long ago that usenet never changes the mind of the
fantatic, but responding with accurate, reasonable and factual
information can be informative to those who lurk or simply follow the
threads.
Cheers, and check 6!
Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
www.thunderchief.org
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
Good point.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
From those like me, who rarely post, but do exactly as Ed says: I've
enjoyed the non-loon posts for many years and hope to do so for many
more. Keep the "... accurate, reasonable and factual information..."
coming.

John, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh ***... another USAF, retired loser.

Why lurk, when you could post ex-serviceman John?

Why not contribute something?

Let me get this right. You can serve in the USAF in your full
capacity, but lack the balls to post to an internet Usenet NG???

WTF???

Go back to your shadow-dwelling obscurity...

Rob

Well, that was uncalled for, missy. The vast majority of people here prefer to read, not post. Must you be so rude, girl?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

.

Quantcast