Re: AWACS vs JSTARS
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:41:30 -0500
Typhoon502 wrote:
I posted too soon. :-/ At any rate, I'm not sure you really want to
try to stuff both missions into one airframe, unless it's the size of
a 777 and can handle the hardware, power, cooling, and manning
requirements that you'd need to really, properly push enough wattage
through the sky.
Doing things like that in a stealthy manner was the concept behind Tacit Blue: http://ftp.fas.org/irp/mystery/tacitblu.htm
As far as manning requirements, the plane could carry just a pilot; all data from the radar could be up-linked to a satellited and from there to a command center, where everything could be viewed, and from where the radar on the aircraft could be commanded from. In fact, this mission could be done by a large UAV instead of a manned aircraft.
That would lighten it up enough to give it greater mission duration or higher altitude capabilities.
It certainly wouldn't be cheap though.
Pat
.
- References:
- AWACS vs JSTARS
- From: Charles Talleyrand
- Re: AWACS vs JSTARS
- From: Typhoon502
- AWACS vs JSTARS
- Prev by Date: Re: I won't fly with that sonofabitch. He'll kill us all.
- Next by Date: Re: WWII Question - Bombing French Cities - What Planes, When?
- Previous by thread: Re: AWACS vs JSTARS
- Next by thread: Re: AWACS vs JSTARS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|