Re: Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- From: Ed Rasimus <rasimusSPAMLESS@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:35:36 GMT
On Mon, 21 May 2007 15:15:54 GMT, The Amaurotean Capitalist
<g.j.bailey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, given that most strafing involved an increasing amount of 'point
nose downwards' to counter-act the forward motion of the aircraft, I
suspect the pilots involved preferred to have their initial fire
undershoot rather than overshoot the target; the former would at least
get them out of having to increase their nose-down attitude whilst
already in a shallow dive towards the surface of the sea.
Gavin Bailey
The secret is a bit of nose-down trim so you can ease off the back
pressure a bit during the firing period along with a steeper dive
angle so that the rate of transit across the ground (i.e. size of
impact footprint) is reduced.
Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
www.thunderchief.org
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- From: The Amaurotean Capitalist
- Re: Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- References:
- Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- From: Rob Arndt
- Re: Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- From: Paul J. Adam
- Re: Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- From: The Amaurotean Capitalist
- Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- Prev by Date: Re: Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- Next by Date: Re: Fokker D.XXIII
- Previous by thread: Re: Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- Next by thread: Re: Question About Spitfire Gun Aiming...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading