Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
- From: miso@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Sep 2006 19:05:29 -0700
Gordon wrote:
The predator was not armed.
I stand corrected, Dan - sorry if I was misinformed. I was under the
assumption that we had assets that could strike targets that these
recce overflights detected.
v/r
Gordon
You got it right the first time. The Predator was armed.
Those Hellfire missiles aren't particularly beefy. Just how many people
would one take out?
http://www.redstone.army.mil/history/systems/HELLFIRE.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
- Next by Date: Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
- Previous by thread: Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
- Next by thread: Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
