Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -

From: "Gordon" <krztalizer@xxxxxxx>
Date: 14 Sep 2006 18:39:48 -0700

The predator was not armed.

I stand corrected, Dan - sorry if I was misinformed. I was under the
assumption that we had assets that could strike targets that these
recce overflights detected.

v/r
Gordon

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
  - From: miso

References:
- Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
  - From: Gordon
- Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
  - From: Dan

Prev by Date: Re: John Boyd--Air Combat Strategy Leading Edge Theorist
Next by Date: Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
Previous by thread: Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
Next by thread: Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
... Gordon wrote: ... Dan - sorry if I was misinformed. ... assumption that we had assets that could strike targets that these ...
(rec.aviation.military)
Re: Latest meter reading
... Dan Johnson ... > FROM tblMeterReading INNER Join AS ... > each of the 17 assets in the database. ... > new assets will have a lower meter reading than the original equipment it ...
(microsoft.public.access.queries)
Re: Next time we see 180 Taliban fighters standing in ranks -
... assumption that we had assets that could strike targets that these ... Those Hellfire missiles aren't particularly beefy. ...
(rec.aviation.military)