Re: german atomic bomb research




Gordon wrote:
roostertail wrote:
rob : did the germans have enough nuclear material for a dirty nuclear
bomb. If so how would they have put it together?

Robert Dale
cell 214-455-5411


Robert, good luck with your quest. This is a good forum to ask the
rest of your questions as well. It was a pleasure to meet you this
morning - enjoy your visit.

v/r
Gordon

To first answer your question- yes, Germany had the most uranium in the
world, enough from German, Belgian, and Czech stocks to supply Japan
via U-boat enough to construct two bombs of their own at their Konan,
occupied Korea facility. Germany was in the process of building 2
radiologicals in the form of a spherical bomb which would have been
loaded into a heavy SC-series free-fall bomb, anywhere from SC-1800 up
to SC-2500. Each sphere contained layers of uranium plates with
kerosene filled in between them. A central detonator shaft ran through
the layers and contained an element for fission on impact when the bomb
nose plunger crushed the elelemt and forced the crushed uranium plates
together. The resulting kerosene explosion would spread radioactive
fission material within a certain radius of Manhatten (the target city)
or penetrated the water table and spew radioactive particles throughout
the city. The Sanger scenario was to detonate the bomb above the city
and have radioactive ash cover it making it contaminated for 3 decades.
These 2 bombs were discovered in a well and destroyed. The German
atomic bomb program, however, is more complicated and new evidence
suggests that some form of nuclear weapon was detonated in Thuringia in
March 1945:

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/18/6/3

This subject matter is highly debated and even more complicated when
one realizes that Virus House was not part of SS Technical Branch
nuclear/plasma research conducted by E-IV. The bomb tested at Thuringia
or possibly near the Baltic may not have been an atomic bomb at all but
a crude plasma weapon. It is interesting to note that neither the
Germans nor the Allies can account for the 18,000-25,000 slave laborers
working at the Thuringia site. They seem to have "vanished" into thin
air!

My advice for you Rob is just wait the scoffers out. Over the last
decade so many German secret weapon discoveries and reversals of
history have come to light. The victors can't cover-up the truth
forever. Germany in early 1945 desperately sought an Amerika bomber to
target NY... for WHAT? A conventional bomb load in 1945 on a one-way
trip would be idiotic. Yet plans were made to use a Ju-290, 390,
modified He-177s, and new orders to resume the Sanger antipodal bomber
and build the Ho-XVIII. The Kriegsmarine was to tow one of the
Prufstand XII V-2 launchers with a Type XXI electroboat. Five
containers were under construction at Stettin, one was completed. A
sea-launched V-2... again, to hit NY. With WHAT? Certainly not a 1 ton
warhead of Amatol.

Postwar in Argentina German scientists there led bu Richter attempted a
fusion weapon under the Heumel Project. What on earth for if the Nazis
were such failures in the nuclear program? Although the project was
treated like Cold Fusion back then, regarded as either a failure or
hoax, Heumel exists and the facilities are still there. The Germans
were more advanced than expected. WW2 documents reveal discussions
concerning nuclear powered aircraft, nuclear submarine propulsion,
gaseous diffusion, and fusion. So, they at least KNEW how to make a
bomb.

My 2 cents, anyway... good luck.

Rob

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dont Ask ; Dont Tell
    ... The Air Force even has suggested that the bomb itself was not armed ... nuclear capsule." ... This was the first thermonuclear weapon deployed by the Air Force and ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Dont Ask ; Dont Tell
    ... The Air Force even has suggested that the bomb itself was not armed ... nuclear capsule." ... two weapons lost up to that time that contained a plutonium trigger. ... This was the first thermonuclear weapon deployed by the Air Force and ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: Who do you believe?
    ... said Iran is  "not close to a weapon at this point and so ... sufficient fissile material for a nuclear weapon, ... very bad outcome" should Tehran move forward with a bomb. ... And Iran having ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: "The really good fighter pilot..."
    ... fully disclosed on WW2 regarding German weapons development. ... 1945 there was a rush to develop several diverse weapon systems all ... Bv-222 a/c all considered stand-bys for bomb drop ... weapon systems and that the US version of the German atomic bomb story ...
    (rec.aviation.military)
  • @@ Germany tested A-bomb - Hitler almost nuked the filthy British @@
    ... Author fuels row over Hitler's bomb ... Germany 'came close to nuclear device in 1944' ... Allied interrogators who questioned the German ... weapon made of conventional high explosives packed around a nuclear core. ...
    (soc.culture.iranian)