Re: Moon landings were a hoax

This topic update is for all those incest cloned borgs that are simply
too dumb and dumber as to even realize that their good ship LOLLIPOP is
sinking right smack dab in the middle of their mainstream of status quo
of their perpetrated cold-war worth of absolute crapolla.

NASA's disinformation-R-us, and of their evidence exclusions that
continually sucks and blows their intellectual flatulence chunks at the
same time. What more can be said?

There's been a rather nasty pot load of LLPOF trouble within your River
City because, Apollo-13 may have been staged (our perpetrated cold-war
spooks were certainly capable of accomplishing that much) or perhaps
not but, the facts remain that in no freaking physics-101 way on Earth
or in hell have folks in synthetic moonsuits walked upon the moon, and
that's a Kodak Corporate recorded photographic moment worth of truth
and nothing but the truth.

I'd also like to ask another of my own sub-topic questions, as to what
has Venus to do with the moon?
Perhaps it's all because of all the liars upon liars that have been
telling us their buttology lies upon lies until those Apollo cows come
home, either that or until their fat lady sings.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/
Obviously the official archives of those original images as having been
obtained from orbit (robotically or manned) are of absolute
proof-positive that of those near white-out zones of cornmeal and
portland cement that were artificially illuminated via xenon lamps,
upon scenes that were no more dusty than for being accommodated here
upon Earth (nicely clumping none the less), nor the least bit raw solar
influx worthy of that environment having been photon reactive as to the
degree of secondary/recoil photons that should have been easily
photo/Kodak moment recorded is simply proof-positive that folks
protecting their NASA butts are either entirely dumb and dumber, as in
dumbfounded into being snookered or, it's that perhaps they're one and
the same rusemasters of this masterful ruse/sting of the century. Which
is it?

I especially like this next official looking page of those autographed
photos that are nearly of lunar white-out zones as having damn few if
any meteorite remains nor of secondary impact shards, then absolutely
zilch, nada as in zero worth of secondary/recoil photons of anything
the least bit near-blue, much less having offered any hard-X-ray dosage
as per otherwise having been since established as a matter of
hard-scientific matter of fact by terrestrial satellite instruments as
for being quite a nasty situation. http://moonpans.com/signed/

Forget all about the fact that there's still no viable fly-by-rocket
lander (US or Russian);
In no explainable physics way possible would the golden brown (reddish
tint of what titanium and iron dust that got a good amount of carbon
blended in) as color and low albedo of the lunar surface have been so
extensively altered by way of folks being situated upon the surface, as
opposed to orbiting at 100+km off the deck. There are simply too many
direct comparisons of color and of the raw intensity or reflective
albedo to work with. If anything, the unfiltered Kodak moments as
having been supposedly obtained upon the surface should had an enormous
amounts of secondary/recoil photons to deal with, so much so that
within shadows and especially upon the items brought along for the ride
should have provided a noticeable degree of a near-blue cast of
secondary illumination, plus having obtained an overall green~bluish
skew which the film was certainly extremely sensitive to recording of
such unless having been extensively spectrum band-pass filtered in
order to have reasonably corrected for such. Even the initial raw Kodak
moments as obtain from their fully robotic Apollo-8 are certainly
giving folks with half a brain a clue as to the color/spectrum shift
and surface albedo considerations that existed. Later missions from
orbit (manned or robotic applied appropriate filters in order to obtain
what's so perfectly natural about the moon color and albedo that simply
doesn't shift simply because of being situated upon the surface as
armed with only a polarised filter that if anything should have made
the lunar surface darker, and certainly not the least bit lighter nor
having excluded the various spectrums of natural color to boot.

Forget all about the stinking moon and even try really hard as to
forget all about those MI5/NSA~NASA individuals and spooks as having
"the right stuff" that so many seem to think are so freaking wonderful.
I might also suggest that folks should desmirk their silly faces the
way our resident warlord(GW Bush) did, and to wipe off their extremely
brown noses, then just per using the regular laws of physics and of the
available hard-science that's been available about Venus, similar to
what the likes of John Ackerman and F.W. Taylor had to work with and lo
and behold, gosh darn if there's not all sorts of perfectly nifty
things about Venus become possible, if not easily doable, and certainly
a whole lot more humanily obtainable as well as survivable than Mars.

My observationology is just what it is, an honest to God subjective
interpretation of what looks far more likely as being artificial than
not, thus either having been constructed by Venusians (possibly prior
to Venus getting itself so hot and nasty upon arriving into our solar
system) or of ETs as having been involved with their taking of whatever
away from Venus. Since these all-knowing wizard like spooks and their
friends can't even detect upon any of our fairly robust and brightly
reflective Apollo remains as situated upon a nearly coal dark and nasty
moon, that which should have been offering an environment as having
been covered in a cosmic morgue worth of crisp meteorites and impact
related shards of dark basalt, all of which coated with a nasty
composite dust of carbon, iron and the likes of titanium up to meters
deep in places, thus obviously these incest cloned borgs and their
friends are not the least qualified to challenge my interpretations of
whatever's on Venus.

Why are they being so closed minded, so mindset upon self
destruction/imploding or bust while focused upon taking as much of
hymanity as they can along for the ride to hell?
~

Life on Venus, a Township, Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
"In war there are no rules" - Brad Guth

Because I'm such a nice sport, I should add this closing rant:
Not that folks encharge of our past, present and future would actually
give the lower 99.9% (scum of the Earth) of humanity a tinkers damn,
nor share a gram worth of remorse;

There has obviously been damn good cloak and dagger reasons as to why
our MI5/NSA~NASA rusemasters haven't published squat worth of those
as-is natural color Kodak moments as having been obtained from orbit
(http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/), whereas such
images are certainly of sufficiently true to life color and of the
expected 11~12% albedo, as well as per their being obtained as near
enough to the moon, typically just a bit more than 100 km which
represents along with a 10X telephoto lens as accommodating 38,400 fold
mafgnification and, as having been applied onto essentially that of an
8192 X 8192 pixle per B&W frame and worth 4096 X 4096 upon color film
that was also worth at least 256 bit color/contrast depth that's easily
offering us a terrific look-see that's a good 100 fold better off than
the best of whatever team KECK has to work with as of today, and tht's
well above whatever it should have taken for quite nicely enlarging
upon their Apollo landing sites, especially since their CM had to have
pasted multiple times directly over each of those sites respectively
upon each and every mission, that which did not even require such as
for those being manned as for their accomplishing such images via
orbiting the moon, although manned orbits were certainly doable as
humanly survivable though perhaps at an elevated TBI factor that might
suggest having been close to their red-line of requiring banked bone
marrow upon their return, especially if they'd actually spent any
EVA/moonsuit ***-naked time upon the reactive surface.

.