Re: Moon landings were a hoax

Dear one and all spooks/moles and incest cloned borgs of America
(including "The CO"),
As usual, you're all absolutely chuck full of it. You can't honestly
address topics related to the moon nor that of Venus because of your
lethal nondisclosure policy that sucks for absolutely anything other
than inflecting collateral damage and the taking of innocent Muslim and
other lives that apparently do not matter as long as we get their oil
at $1/barrel (if paying Muslims even that much) and/or get to decide
whom gets access to that oil. In fact, the mainstream status quo can't
manage to address whatever I have to say about much of anything without
fear of their being shot exactly like JFK (made to look like another
USSR plot) for his intentions of shutting down the Apollo fiasco before
it was too late (guess what JFK, you lost big-time because it was
obviously much later than you thought).

First off; Those that can't be bothered with the actual truth(s) (such
as "The CO" and perhaps yourself if you're strictly pro-mainstream
status quo or bust) will avoid anything specific as to the topic at
hand or of the questions imposed, while often using those scripted
catchy phrases suggesting that you somehow can't manage to understand a
word that I'm saying, or that you simply can't be the least bit
bothered with whatever hard-science facts or as to whatever the regular
laws of physics as applied to other than Earth. However, as per
utilizing those conditional physics and skewed-science as having
supported your perpetrated cold-war and that of the NASA/Apollo ruse is
just fine and dandy, as well as utilizing whatever evidence exclusions
works especially well if such makes your pagan religion and/or resident
warlord(s) look good.

Unlike yourself and all other incest cloned borgs, I obviously believe
that we've been officially and systematically snookered from the very
get-go, and since I believe there's hard-science in support of UFOs,
ETs and the strong possibility that there's been and may still be other
life upon Venus, as well as I believe that our moon was once upon a
time that of an icy protomoon via the Oort zone, if not having been
derived from the Sirius star system in a similar manner as for where
the likes of a geologically hot Venus came from, as such that makes be
into the ultimate bad guy and/or the messenger from hell. Of course,
folks taking the exact opposit side of my challenge wouldn't dare
impose an honest question, and much less contribute by way of an honest
share and share alike method because, I'd return fire by way of sharing
upon hard-scientific evidence and, I'd go so far as to utilize the
regular laws of physics as for asking my questions as well as per
answering upon most of whatever's being asked.

Unfortunately, this pathetic USENET has been primarily that of an
ongoing MI5/NSA~MI6 cesspool of need-to-know information, of otherwise
getting to know thy enemy as well as on behalf of orchestrating via
publishing their continuing mainstream status quo of disinformation via
dog-wagging and scripted infomercials. Few contributors are whom you
think they are (most phony baloney code names are actually collectives
of three or more agents). With the right code phrases and/or level(s)
of encryption, even Osama bin Laden has an undetectably direct
interface to his good buddy within our highest office (namely GW Bush
and/or British MI5/MI6). Since USENET remains under the command and at
the disposal of our intelligence agencies, as much and/or as little is
made accessible to the public, whereas fully encrypted files have
always been permitted and if need be just as easily extracted/disposed
of within milliseconds of their being posted. Public access and usage
does not in any way affect the intended security and/or capacity as to
transferring data on a need-to-know/nondisclosure basis. Knowing thy
enemy remains as key element of USENET, and the GOOGLE "search for" and
email notification interface simply improves upon that capability.
Posting whatever on USENET is directly accessed and if need be filtered
and/or diverted by the prime government established central agencies
(MI5/NSA~MI6) and/or via whatever web of nodes associated. USENET is
only as privet as your level of encryption can make it. USENET is also
a viable two-way spermware tool by which as little or as much can be
delivered to and/or extracted from your PC unless custom and updated
firewalls are established (Microsoft makes certain that there's always
a back/side door into your computer, insuring that all public PC IDs
are traceable and that MI5/NSA PC are not). USENET is as much a part of
the ongoing cold-war perpetration as the air we breath. Take it or
leave it, USENET either sucks and/or it provides the necessary pathway
of tools for the communications task at hand for accommodating the
good, the bad and the ugly.

Like product trade names having no association with their originators,
the truth has become whatever you'd care to make of it, as in where-is
as-is has become a take it or leave it situation because there's often
not a shred of independent expertise nor hard-science backing it up.
Most folks do not want to know the truth, fewer would actually do
anything once truth becomes known, fewer yet would share and share
alike even if their own lives depended upon it. Thus whatever lies are
as just good as gold, especially once having been published into
textbooks and science journals. There is no actual word of God on
USENET, thus anti-UFO, anti-ET, blatant paganism, ulterior motives and
of hidden agendas is the rule, not the exception. Few say what they
mean and fewer individually mean what they say (99.9% of the internet
either isn't the least bit important nor offering the truth). Go
figure.

No Venus, No Sirius = No Apollo (at least not as situated upon the
surface of the moon).

Unfiltered Kodak moments simply do not lie. Only people behind such
unfiltered cameras lie, especially those having motive, means and
opportunity, along with a good deal of perpetrated cold-war bigotry to
boot goes without saying. There are no USSR smoking guns because, it
was all a ruse/sting that was mutually taken advantage of on both
sides.

There's absolutely no hard-science supporting that we've walked upon
the moon. There are no such Kodak moments as having been moonsuit/EVA
obtained that are believable, and there's apparently no way of ever
verifying squat on behalf of whatever's NASA/Apollo. Thus, it's been
nothing but the worst possible liars telling us lies until them Apollo
cows come home, whereas everything since has been a damn lie plus
bloody dog-wagging spendy fiasco to boot. GW Bush, *** Cheney and the
likes of Henry Kissinger are the worst possible liars as of lately,
with MOS Skull and Bones cultism on the way of replacing them energy
and blood sucking bastards.

Walking upon our moon remains as a real physics and science stretch of
the imagination, that which comes to us via lord and master NASA/Apollo
plus by way of those spendy publications, textbooks and them NOVA
infomercials without their once having the likes of Venus nor Sirius as
easily and unavoidably imaged from the ideal perspective of a nearly
coal like dusty terrain of darkness and, otherwise upon a highly
reactive (hard-X-ray generating) lunar surface, not to mention there
being a lack of any verifiable R&D/prototype fly-by-rocket lander in
addition to the rather highly unreasonable lack of the otherwise
unavoidable secondary/recoil photons of near-blue plus, there's still
absolutely zilch worth of near-UV getting photo recorded as perfectly
viable and reasonably intensive photons via their own unfiltered Kodak
moments, having but supposedly the raw solar influx of 1.4 kw/m2 that's
sharing a great deal more of UV energy/m2 potential than upon the
atmospherically filtered/shielded Earth. As such, there's a wee bit of
an insurmountable problem that's proving squat on behalf of those
Apollo/EVA missions.

However, it seems there's also been by way of my honest
observationology and having been supported via the common laws of
physics and otherwise of doable applied technology as to offering
perfectly good indications of other life as having been coexisting upon
Venus, of such having absolute loads of vertical differentials as well
as geothermal energy to burn, even though whatever substances will not
actually burn within such an O2 starved environment as having been
hosting a perfectly rational township of a fairly substantial community
that so happens to include a bridge and perhaps a few of your standard
rigid airships plus accommodating that rather nifty UFO Park-n-Ride
Tarmac as a mountainous terrain of substantial modifications that's not
exactly following mother nature's standards.
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The ESA Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as situated
within the ME-L1/EM-L2 zone
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus a few other somewhat testy topics by; Brad
Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.