Re: Punch test?
- From: veeduber@xxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Oct 2005 23:16:22 -0700
RST Engineering wrote:
> Bob...cut me some slack...
>
----------------------------------------
Okay. But I wasn't aware you needed any.
My msg was in response to Mike's. The fact it appeared after yours is
an artifact of my ISP, which has taken as long as 24 hours to upload a
message to a Usenet newsgroup.
My closing para was to make sure Mike understood that the condition of
the covering is not the only criteria for re-covering.
-R.S.Hoover
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Punch test?
- From: RST Engineering
- Re: Punch test?
- References:
- Punch test?
- From: Michael Horowitz
- Re: Punch test?
- From: veeduber
- Re: Punch test?
- From: RST Engineering
- Punch test?
- Prev by Date: Re: Moller Skycar for $3.5 Million
- Next by Date: Re: Fix the high cost [Was:] High Cost of Sportplanes
- Previous by thread: Re: Punch test?
- Next by thread: Re: Punch test?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading