Re: LED taillight question
- From: Nate Nagel <njnagel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:31:02 -0500
Tegger wrote:
"P.V." <ano@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:tMqal.222$xJ.86@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"Don Stauffer" <stauffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> kirjoitti viestissä news:496a22a0$0$16042$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxTegger wrote:Incandescent bulbs have a steady glow. When at night you're behindThis is sheer speculation on my part, but the DC on the car
cars with incandescent taillights and you make your eyes scan
quickly from one side to the other, the taillights will appear to
leave a solid streak in your field of vision.
I've noticed that there are certain makes of cars with LED
taillights where a quick eye-scan from side to side creates a sort
of "stutter trail" of widely-spaced red dots instead of a streak.
This is obviously due to the fact that LEDs pulse on and off in
operation. But what I don't understand is why it's only certain
models that do this. I've noticed the "stutter" with Cadillacs,
Lincolns, Nissans and VWs, but not with Hondas/Acuras and BMWs.
Honda and BMW LED taillight design makes a nearly solid streak on a
quick eye scan.
Anybody know why the difference?
electrical bus is not filtered, it is pretty noisy. LEDs can really
modulate at fairly high frequency. Incandescents do not, because the
thermal inertia of the bulb filters out all except VERY low
frequency. I wonder if we are seeing the noise from the alternator
and regulator, and maybe even hash induced by motors.
But why only on certain makes? Are some manufacturers better able to condition their electrical systems than others?
Here comes my speculation:
I believe they are intentionally modulated to achieve lower-than-full brightness; I've seen rear lights that first appear as "stutter rail"
in the eye, then when the driver applies break the lights go much
brighter and non-stuttering.
So it would seem same lights are used
both as standard rear lights and break lights. I think it'd be better
(or at least nicer to the eye) to just adjust the voltage, but maybe
it's cheaper to the manufacturer to modulate the power.
That was my first thought as well.
I was guessing that the "stutter" ones altered pulse frequency rather than voltage to the LEDs. To wit: foot off the brake, the LED pulses /less/ frequently; foot on the brake, the LED pulses /more/ frequently, the eye perceiving the increased pulse frequency as increased brightness.
I suspect but have no proof that the LEDs in the taillight cluster are wired up so as to provide full brightness when fed a steady 12V (e.g. if a single LED has a voltage drop of 1.3V they wire every 10 of them in series) and then the "dim" (parking light) functionality is provided by PWM.
nate
--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
.
- References:
- LED taillight question
- From: Tegger
- Re: LED taillight question
- From: Don Stauffer
- Re: LED taillight question
- From: P.V.
- Re: LED taillight question
- From: Tegger
- LED taillight question
- Prev by Date: Re: LED taillight question
- Next by Date: Re: 1996 S-10 Anti-lock light
- Previous by thread: Re: LED taillight question
- Next by thread: Re: LED taillight question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|