Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- From: Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:35:02 -0600
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:21:04 -0600, "Bob" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:tba9r1pb59p3l91h4ii0t3q5qvko4j1bih@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:10:46 -0600, "Bob" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"aarcuda69062" <nonelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:nonelson-212D16.08583929122005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> In article <oQJsf.3771$dl.1701@xxxxxxxx>, "Bob" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > Does your chewing gum lose it's flavor on the bedpost overnight?
>>>>>
>>>>> This guys website has to be a real jewel. He's damn near as clueless as
>>>>> glickman!
>>>>> Bob
>>>>
>>>> Well, no...
>>>>
>>>> Larry is receptive to learning and understanding.
>>>
>>>
>>>Well.... sometimes he is and sometimes he isn't.
>>>
>>>> Mike on the other hand thinks that everything is exactly the same
>>>> as his clapped out Blazer, i.e., all alternators are mounted up
>>>> top and easy to service.
>>>> Industry definition; "knows enough to be dangerous."
>>>
>>>"knows enough to be dangerous." That's a pretty good description Neil, but
>>>I
>>>still think it applies to both of them. LG seems to listen to you pretty
>>>well but I think he starts foaming at the mouth whenever he sees a post
>>>from
>>>me and damn if I can understand why.... I guess he doesn't appreciate
>>>constructive criticism..... lol
>>> Bob
>>
>> If you insist on being spanked, Bob, I'm going to have to begin
>> charging for this "service." I accept Western Union Moneygrams and
>> Certified Bank Checks only.
>>
>> Email me for where to send the first payment.
>>
>> Lg
>
>Sorry Larry but you haven't beaten or "spanked" me at anything. Even the
>example that you picked about monitoring fuel pressure with your data logger
>was wrong as you saw if you read Neil's reply to you. I think we can both
>agree that his info is technically very accurate.
> Bob
That is the only thing you and I can agree upon. That and the sun
will rise tomorrow.
I support aarcuda 110% because that is a guy who knows his ***. You
I am still a tiny bit leary of. Time may prove me wrong. Maybe you
do know your stuff. I haven't been in the n/g long enough to really
make a who's who list yet, but I'm getting there.
One thing we have in common, we have a love/hate relationship with
automobiles. Maybe that is enough.
Lg
.
- References:
- 91 Ford Explorer
- From: Stan Weiss
- Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- From: xblazinlv
- Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- From: aarcuda69062
- Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- From: Bob
- Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- From: aarcuda69062
- Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- From: Bob
- Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- From: Lawrence Glickman
- Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- From: Bob
- 91 Ford Explorer
- Prev by Date: Re: 5.0 problem
- Next by Date: Re: 2000 4.6l SOHC FORD IAC sensor problem
- Previous by thread: Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- Next by thread: Re: 91 Ford Explorer
- Index(es):