Re: unnecessary octane = carbon?
- From: Ryan Underwood <nemesis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:16:06 -0500
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>The latest theory constructed around this idea is that the knock sensor
>doesen't hear the engine knocking so it keeps enrichening the mixture
>until it just begins to hear knocking, since it never will due to the high
>octane it makes the engine run too rich.
If you were going to use the knock sensor instead of the O2 sensors to
calibrate the mixture, wouldn't you want to LEAN the mixture until it started
knocking, and then slightly richen it from that point? How would you ever get
knocking by continuing to enrich a mixture which is already not knocking?
.
- References:
- unnecessary octane = carbon?
- From: Ryan Underwood
- Re: unnecessary octane = carbon?
- From: Ted Mittelstaedt
- unnecessary octane = carbon?
- Prev by Date: Re: 99 GMC Savanna emission problem...NEED HELP
- Previous by thread: Re: unnecessary octane = carbon?
- Next by thread: Avoid Major Oil companies
- Index(es):