Re: Fox says the gopher is not the reason for NASCAR TV ratings problem

Well said McCoy!! & agree Hill has at least both of those 'qualities'!
--
Crusader

"John McCoy" <igopogo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9C1A7F5EF9888pogosupernews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
stonej <stonej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:255e1a9f-fb4a-40e0-a5d7-afe9ad7bd0a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/motor/nascar/2009-05-28-fox-tv-ratings_N
.htm

So, Hill is either totally clueless, or being deliberately obtuse.

Of course it's not Digger that's the problem - it's the broadcast
philosophy that Digger represents that everyone is complaining
about. We don't want technical gimmicks like cameras in the
pavement, with or without stupid animations. We want to watch
the race. Once FOX figures that out, they may see ratings
improve.

John


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Silbury Hill
    ... On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:23:56 GMT, in sci.archaeology, Digger wrote: ... have been working inside the hill and got a fascinating insight into what's ... A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Silbury Hill
    ... Digger wrote: ... team who have been working inside the hill and got a fascinating ... insight into what's going on there, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Loading