Re: Loomis or Gordan?
- From: "WildWeasel" <wweasel_24@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:29:56 -0400
"armpit" wrote ...
> "WildWeasel" wrote ...
>>
>>
>> I agree. Used to be that Jeff could drive a rock to a win, but I think the
>> aero crap has taken a lot of what the driver can do out of the deal.
>
> I couldn't disagree more. The less aero downforce the car has, the more you
> have to rely on driver skill.
>
Well, on Wind Tunnel Ray said setting up a car with the current aero is like
'balancing on a razor blade' which, to me, means you got it or you're bleeding
to death. I don't think there's much of an "off, but drivable by a great
driver" anymore.
> And I don't think that directly translates to JG's poor (by 24 team standards)
> performance this season. I think it has more to do with the teams inability to
> find good setups to compenste for the loss of downforce. That would explain
> their early success, and would explain why they faded as other teams figured
> things out ahead of the 24.
>
> Bottom line: I think that Robbie was unable to come up with good setups to
> compensate for the aero changes.
>
I agree with the bottom line.
.
- References:
- Re: Loomis or Gordan?
- From: Vandar
- Re: Loomis or Gordan?
- From: 4-X-Champ
- Re: Loomis or Gordan?
- From: WildWeasel
- Re: Loomis or Gordan?
- From: armpit
- Re: Loomis or Gordan?
- Prev by Date: Re: My solution to the old system and the chase.
- Next by Date: Re: My solution to the old system and the chase.
- Previous by thread: Re: Loomis or Gordan?
- Next by thread: Re: Loomis or Gordan?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|