Re: Poole's Points System - updated following bristol
- From: "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2005 22:00:20 GMT
On 30 Aug 2005 20:10:09 GMT, "Crusader" <cru32@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<3njsllF1skuhU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>Poole didn't say, but i wonder if he meant that anyone with a win
>should be in The Chase?
I think his points system moves people who win once
to the top of the heap. No guarantee that they'll be in the
Top 10.
>Or just the Top10 Points?
I guess it would remain "Top 10 or within 400 of
the leader" (although that number might have to
be adjusted for the change in stats).
>Altho there are 11 Winners now, it's possible next year to have only
>9 winners after 26.Rich, then what does Poole propose?
His article doesn't say.
>I thot at 1st, 500pts for a win was extremely excessive, but it doesn't
>look too bad! One thing for sure, RW & MM wouldn't be 'Strokin' right now!
They're playing by this year's rules, not by Poole's Rule. :o)
Marty
.
- References:
- Poole's Points System
- From: Martin X. Moleski, SJ
- Re: Poole's Points System - updated following bristol
- From: armpit
- Poole's Points System
- Prev by Date: Re: Driving out of contention
- Next by Date: USA WEEKEND'S '04 Most Caring Athletes
- Previous by thread: Re: Poole's Points System - updated following bristol
- Next by thread: Re: Poole's Points System - updated following bristol
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|