Re: Senna...

ric zito wrote:
Phil Newnham <pnewnham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

ric zito wrote:
Phil Newnham <pnewnham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

ric zito wrote:
Phil Newnham <pnewnham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...if only half of it wasn't tabloid bull***...
Eh?? C'mon Phil, it's a friggin' blog, not The BBC World Service.

To be taken with several pinches of NaCl. Still, the guy is spot on in
his executive summary.
It's a blog summarising an impression gained largely by reading stuff
that's been made up. If you think that's spot on, then I'm not going to
argue with you!
<sigh>

It's an opinion ...which happens to be spot on.
IMO, of course...:-)
I find forming an opinion about a person based on tabloid lies to be unlikely to be anything other than a load of worthless tosh, but YMMV as
always :p

Err, we may have crossed wires here - I was talking about his summary of
the race... I have no idea if the Senna stuff is lies or not. I vaguely
remember Lewis mentioning him a few times, but I can't remember the
context. (Monaco?)

Oh, well I didn't read the article, only the Senna stuff that was posted here, so that's why I didn't follow you!

--
Phil

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tmc1979/
.

Loading