Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: "Bigbird" <bigbird.usenetAPLER_SPLAT@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2008 14:05:01 GMT
CatharticF1 wrote:
"Bigbird" <bigbird.usenetAPLER_SPLAT@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:xn0fvmxg7b2nua00b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
CatharticF1 wrote:to >> ensure they >> >> keep the >> > stolen Spa points.
"Bigbird" <bigbird.usenetAPLER_SPLAT@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:xn0fvlobsijotq00b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
CatharticF1 wrote:appeal >> >> court? >> > Looks like they are making every effort
"Bigbird" <bigbird.usenetAPLER_TRAP@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:xn0fvjv385q2ox4015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
CatharticF1 wrote:
"Bigbird" <bigbird.usenetAPLER_TRAP@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:xn0fvikj74g0dcn00n@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
CatharticF1 wrote:
peter <scoular@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:dK$eMNAJd+ >> 1IFwwa@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
How come Ferrari get to cross examine Hamilton at the
last >> >> >> >> year? >> > What is the link between your post and
Why did McLaren try to have Williams penalised in Brazil
the one >> >> >> >> you replied to, on >> >> > your planet?
jerk...that >> would >> > explain it.didn't >> > understand the post and yours is just a knee
See dictionary under 'Hypocrisy' :)
No, that doesn't explain it. Why don't you try? Perhaps you
McLaren >> and >> I pointed out it was equally odd for McLaren to be
Oh Bird - you do pick on odd things to be pedantic about. Peter
thinks it odd Ferrari are involved in a matter involving
so vocal >> about an >> issue involving Williams.
cross >> > examining Hamilton.
No, you are quite wrong. Pay attention to the posts to which you
reply.
Peters post was particular not simply Ferraris interest but their
ability to get involved with the court process to the point of
I was not being pedantic Brenda, you were merely demonstrating
ignorance.
You're such an arse sometimes.
Keep squirming.
Brenda dear child, what have I to squirm about. You are the one
trying to change what people have said to suit your purposes.
Your reply is inappropriate. I think you know that now, which is why
you are getting "arsey".
You need to complicate things to protect what's left of your
credibility.
I am not complicating things. You are simply avoiding replying to
the posts as written, preferring some vague interpretation.
So have you got an answer for Peter or have you decided to run away.
Been there done that, you can play here by yourself as long as you
like.
Well you may think it an answer, but in reality it simply demonstrates
your avoidance of the point he made.
--
In GP Manager Pro, You play the plucky manager of a brand new Formula 1
Grand Prix team! Build your team up, negotiate with drivers, suppliers
and sponsors to build the best car to pair with the best drivers and
annihilate the opposition! http://tinyurl.com/GPManagerPro
.
- References:
- Ferrari at appeal court
- From: peter
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: CatharticF1
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: Bigbird
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: CatharticF1
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: Bigbird
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: CatharticF1
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: Bigbird
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: CatharticF1
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: Bigbird
- Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- From: CatharticF1
- Ferrari at appeal court
- Prev by Date: Re: Kimi throws away more points
- Next by Date: Ferrari must be elated to have drivers such as Raikkonen and Massa instead of Alonso.
- Previous by thread: Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- Next by thread: Re: Ferrari at appeal court
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|