Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- From: address@xxxxxx (ric zito)
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:24:53 +0200
Paul-B <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ping Richard Miller...
ping Bigbird...
ping ...oh never mind.
Can't resist it, can you, ric?
No. Could you? :-)
Was this post *really* necessary, I'm sure
Richard and bird and others will read Dave's post anyway.
Perhaps.
I was ceremoniously KFed by Richard in another thread "for not being man
enough to admit I was wrong". It's his opinion and I accept that.
But it's funny how things work out in the end, isn't it?
As for the pillock Bigbird, I don't much care either way.
--
ric at pixelligence dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- From: Paul-B
- Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- References:
- HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- From: Brian Lawrence
- Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- From: Dave Baker
- Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- From: ric zito
- Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- From: Paul-B
- HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- Prev by Date: Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- Next by Date: Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- Previous by thread: Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- Next by thread: Re: HAM had a 'front wing failure'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|