Re: What can we as "die-hard F1 fans" do now?

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:32:36 -0700, Mark <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Luigi Topolino wrote:
On 31 Jul 2007 16:02:18 GMT, "Bigbird" <bigbird.usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Luigi Topolino wrote:
On 31 Jul 2007 13:22:00 GMT, "Bigbird" <bigbird.usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anand Nene wrote:
[...]
So what can we as die-hard F1 fans do now? Any options left?
Did you mean to say die-hard Ferrari fans
You're just another Union Jack-waving retard who believes "she asked
for it" is a valid defense to rape...
You are so repugnant only a gag response is truly appropriate.

You have nothing of interest to say about anything F1 related.

Go back to your sibling rape fantasies.

Please do distinguish your imbecilic defense of McLaren's admitting
cheating as anything other than merely despicably 'blaming the
victim'.

...Any of you filthy bastards.

Peter, Paul, "Mary"?

Please, go right ahead, we'll wait.

Ah, it was not McLaren team but a rogue employee that had the material -

....Disputed by McLaren themselves.

evidenced by Coughlan's wife photocopying it in a commercial printing
place rather than at McLaren itself, and Coughlan approaching another
team. On the other hand, not only was there not time to incorporate such
information into the McLaren, and there is no evidence that the McLaren
is of a similar design, but McLaren provided full developmental evidence
to the hearing showing that their car has not been influenced by the
information contained within the documents.

You, along with the whitewashing crew of the corrupt BMIA, pretend to
not understand how the information received could be used tactically
and strategically. You have not thereby proved that the materials
could be of no use nor benefit, justifying the imposition of
absolutely no penalty nor sanction.

You fool no one.
.

Quantcast