Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: Phil Newnham <pnewnham@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:59:17 +0100
John Briggs wrote:
Phil Newnham wrote:Luigi Topolino wrote:I think it would a panic to bend an F-5 around the sky:The government restricts the availability of all sorts of dangerous
http://www.thorntonaircraft.com/body/body.cfm?page_name=mil
...You're free to be an obstructionist ninny.
things but there's no reason not to allow you to have a weaponless
F-5, provided you prove capable of flying it within the FAA rules. I
can't see them letting you run riot in the sky with a couple of live
Skywinders though - what would be the point? You have no legal way of
using them.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state..."
Surely that has to win a prize for the worst written sentence in a constitutional document?
(Air National Guard, anyone?)
Mark's free to join the ANG if he wants to but somehow I don't think that's what he has in mind.
--
Phil
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tmc1979/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- References:
- OT - Virginia Tech
- From: Paul-B
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: CatharticF1
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: ric zito
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: Luigi Topolino
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: ric zito
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: Luigi Topolino
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: shepshep1@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: Luigi Topolino
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: shepshep1@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: Luigi Topolino
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: Phil Newnham
- Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- From: John Briggs
- OT - Virginia Tech
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- Next by Date: Re: Mosley says customer cars legal from 2008
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Virginia Tech
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|