Re: Button is falling back
- From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 09 Jun 2006 00:17:04 +0300
peter <scoular@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Da Frank <fajp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Rev limiter: If it is set to 18Ks, that is 300RevsPerSecond, an engine
that is on full throttle will not stop at 18,000.
Why?
No how, no way. It
will overrev slightly. It'll be lucky not to see 18,200 IMO.
Even if true why would the engineers not account for it and set an
appropriate rev limit? 17800 rpm or whatever.
Do engineers not study control theory any more?
Phil
--
The man who is always worrying about whether or not his soul would be
damned generally has a soul that isn't worth a damn.
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-1894), American physician and writer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Button is falling back
- From: Graham Hodgson
- Re: Button is falling back
- References:
- Re: Button is falling back
- From: michaelgooding
- Re: Button is falling back
- From: Phil Newnham
- Re: Button is falling back
- From: Paul Harman
- Re: Button is falling back
- From: Phil Newnham
- Re: Button is falling back
- From: Da Frank
- Re: Button is falling back
- From: peter
- Re: Button is falling back
- Prev by Date: Re: Ferrari has the largest number of fans ?
- Next by Date: Re: Silverstone!
- Previous by thread: Re: Button is falling back
- Next by thread: Re: Button is falling back
- Index(es):
Loading