Re: Drivers back Schumacher's penalty
- From: DC <gojphNOSPAMTA@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:34:35 +0100
On Wed, 31 May 2006 07:21:28 GMT, CatharticF1 <eferrari@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
DC <gojphNOSPAMTA@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:qsaq7213chvialo370fdk1krj14stni6kb@xxxxxxx:
On Wed, 31 May 2006 03:10:56 GMT, CatharticF1 <eferrari@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
DC <gojphNOSPAMTA@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:m0dp72ls52n8ks6cheg38o96uscic6q2u8@xxxxxxx:
Let me point out the bias that renders the article meaningless.
Help yourself, Mark III... :-)
What happened to Mark II?
Duh, Mark Fruitcake and Mark Kiwi...
they fought for the title in Jerez in 1997 (having succeeded in
doing the same to Damon Hill in 1994),
Speculative at best, wrong imo.
No. Really?
Imagine your surprise!
I nearly fell off my fence...
"He couldn't help himself," the former driver and television
presenter David Kennedy observed of Schumacher's foul. "What we saw
on Saturday was DNA at work."
And that's a reasonable comment, is it?
Maybe not. But you can't deny that when the pressure gets to him, the
true measure of the man becomes evident...
I'm opening myself up to a world of pain here, but I'm a fence sitter on
this one. I can't see how either side of the argument 'adds up'.
Well, at least you're not trying to defend the indefensible...
David
.
- References:
- Drivers back Schumacher's penalty
- From: DC
- Re: Drivers back Schumacher's penalty
- From: CatharticF1
- Re: Drivers back Schumacher's penalty
- From: DC
- Re: Drivers back Schumacher's penalty
- From: CatharticF1
- Drivers back Schumacher's penalty
- Prev by Date: Re: I Don't Care What You Say...
- Next by Date: Re: Next Year's Scenarios
- Previous by thread: Re: Drivers back Schumacher's penalty
- Next by thread: Re: Drivers back Schumacher's penalty
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|