Re: Glasshouses


"CatharticF1" <eferrari@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:443a4b66@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bigbird wrote in news:49uuo9Fq9m99U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:


"CatharticF1" <eferrari@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97A164F4924eferrariheavennet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Bigbird" <BigBird.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:49t3o6Fqaun8U1 @individual.net:


"CatharticF1" <eferrari@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4438d49c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bigbird wrote in news:49rss1Fq4qkoU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:


"CatharticF1" <eferrari@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4438555e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phil Carmody wrote in news:87lkugkqjo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

I didn't post it..

You have a doppelganger?

I think we can work out that the number of sentient brains
involved is definitely an even number.

I meant the images - I didn't put the images up. :)


Oh you're behaving like a gossipy housewife. You don't make up
rumours you just pass them on, right?

Not at all - the images speak volumes.

So what do the voices in your head tell you.

That you'd prefer distraction to discussion.


Rather hypocritical of you given your post, which true to form, is
more propaganda than material worth further discussion. However I did
discuss it whereas you simply disowned it. Enough said.

Well as I said elsewhere the point of the thread was simply to point out
that the practice of deflecting wings with flattening elements is
commonplace.

And I rather suspect it achieved that, the sliding element on the Ferrari
nose in Malaysia is an area I have long discussed, but that is no more.

Much as you'd like to portray every subject aside from it as avoiding
that.


Oh wake up to yourself man. You are continually contradicting yourself.

You achieved nothing because you have shown nothing new. You know full well
that the consensus is that all wings flex.

You chose the subject "glasshouses". As the only stones being thrown lately
with regard to wings have been the ones at Ferrari for apparently cheating
it is difficult to reconcile your claim. I put this to you in response to
your original post and you chose not to reply. Any doubts about your motives
are of your own making.

Want to start digging yourself out try explaining the title you gave the
topic.

Only when your not wearing those red tinted glasses do you make any sense at
all.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: I spied a spy plane!
    ... been catching a glimpse of a U-2 hanging around southern California ... Turned out to be a NASA ER-2, ... Some of the images appear to show a WB-57, ... wings; the latter's wings are also quite a bit longer. ...
    (sci.geo.earthquakes)
  • Re: OT: I spied a spy plane!
    ... been catching a glimpse of a U-2 hanging around southern California ... Turned out to be a NASA ER-2, ... Some of the images appear to show a WB-57, ... wings; the latter's wings are also quite a bit longer. ...
    (sci.geo.earthquakes)
  • Re: IVSM 2005
    ... >I was at IVSM last weekend...unfortunately couldn't stay longer, ... >if anyone has images or comments they too would like to share.... ... > Wings & Wheels ... > Please visit the Wings & Wheels website at: ...
    (rec.aviation.soaring)
  • IVSM 2005
    ... again a great event and if you get a chance to go well worth the time ... if anyone has images or comments they too would like to share.... ... Please visit the Wings & Wheels website at: ...
    (rec.aviation.soaring)
  • Re: Randall Model 1
    ... why did you chose THAT model?> ... Mainly because it was the one A.G. Russell had on order (but not spoken ... I googled it up a few images too; That is one sexy knife Buck. ... question is, is it the India stag hilt, or is that just "one option"? ...
    (rec.knives)