Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- From: Creamy Goodness <News4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 03:54:44 GMT
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:58:57 -0500, forty <cforte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Creamy Goodness wrote:
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:41:58 +0000, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Danielowski wrote:
Phil Newnham wrote:Why? We're running a bike engined 600cc racing car here, and it has a
This, I don't understand. Red Bull were cutting holes in the sides ofI think it not a matter of power, but a matter of revs. Even if they
their sidepods too. If the engines produce less power (and surely they
must do) then they should require less cooling, so it should be easy to
step down to a V8 cooling solution from a V10. Unless they
underestimated severely, and the engine guys have managed to pull much
more power than expected from the V8.
don't have as much power as with V10s, they should be near or over
20.000 rpms, with requires much more cooling than with V10s.
smaller radiator than, say, a 1l car does, despite revving to around
12,000 against the 1l car's 5500. It would have an even smaller radiator
if it was geared to run as fast as the car does, because the cooling
would be better with a higher airflow. The heat rejected from the engine
through the radiator(s) is a function of the energy being released from
the fuel, the efficiency of the engine (in terms of how much energy is
converted to mechanical work at the flywheel, not miles per gallon or
litres per kilometre), and how much heat energy is rejected through the
exhaust system. Basically, the radiator's job is to get rid of
whatever's left over:
Energy from fuel = Useful work + heat down exhaust system + heat through
radiator
ignoring conductive cooling through the bodywork, which will be small,
if the system is functioning correctly. Basically cooling requirement
scales with power, not revs. Even at 20,000 rpms they still produce less
power than the V10s - the laptimes they're pulling are due to improved
aerodynamics and better tyres.
You've completely ignored friction, with your usual thoroughness.
Not one bit. Allow me to break it down for you:
Friction causes heat in the engine. Coolant absorbs heat from the
engine. Coolant passes through radiator and is dissipated. Thus, the
variable Phil labeled 'heat through radiator' is a function of heat from
friction.
So, let 'heat from friction' = x and 'heat through the radiator' = y
y=f(x)
Thus, when including y in an equation, x is inherently included.
Thus:
"Energy from fuel = Useful work + heat down exhaust system + y"
is the exact same formula as:
"Energy from fuel = Useful work + heat down exhaust system + f(x)"
....You are another uncomprehending imbecile.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- From: Wifton Percy
- Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- From: Phil Newnham
- Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- From: Danielowski
- Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- From: Phil Newnham
- Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- From: Creamy Goodness
- Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- From: forty
- Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- Next by Date: Re: Kimi on new qualifying
- Previous by thread: Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- Next by thread: Re: Cosworth V8 may be the most powerful in the pitlane?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|