Re: V8s faster than V10s?

MK IV wrote:
Bigbird scribbled:
MK IV wrote:
Bigbird scribbled:
MK IV wrote:

It would seem that your main issue is that you butted into the
thread without understanding the thread.

Try reading the thread rather than making random nonsensical
replies.
Dude, try finding your way to the top. I started this thread, you
butted in.

No, you lost the thread... try reading it.

Try understanding what Mark was trying to assert.

He asserted that Cosworth could draw on to their recent experience
designing V8s for CART.


....and...

he implied Ferrari had no relevant experience to draw upon in the last 40
years.

Then think about what I
was trying to draw attention to. Then we come to your tangential
insertion...

You said that Ferrari also built V8s for their '200mph super cars'. I
replied: "So what?"

Their super cars aren't designed for racing.

....and the difference between an Enzo (show car in your own words) and an
MC12 is?

That's the point.

(Glad to see it is not impossible for you to overcome your ADD.)

SOOOOOOO, spelling it out for you, the knowledge gained in producing a few
thousand 200mph V8s and other high performance engines is not exactly going
to be useless....and somewhat more usefull than that gained from producing
2-stroke lawnmower engines as you assert.

You may prattle on but I think it's clear you are just being argumentative
and perverse like your Creamy pal.


.

Loading