Re: "Michael has no chance"
- From: Ian Dalziel <iandalziel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:26:04 +0000
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:20:44 +0000, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ian Dalziel wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:09:29 GMT, CatharticF1 <eferrari@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If you want to focus on collisions that appear deliberate between MS and
Damon - turn the camera around at Silverstone and Monza next season.
Because Damon's moves at both of those races were never going to result
in anything but both drivers leaving the circuit.
Strangely they attract almost no attention.
Both pretty abysmal I agree - but where's the motive for doing them
deliberately?
If it was ok by the FIA when Michael did it...? Same reasoning as Senna
again - if he's not playing fair, then neither shall I.
Senna and Schumacher got championships by doing it - Damon only got
gravel.
I can't see why those could be anything but botched overtakes.
--
Ian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Michael has no chance"
- From: Phil Newnham
- Re: "Michael has no chance"
- References:
- RE: "Michael has no chance"
- From: John Gibson
- Re: "Michael has no chance"
- From: Mark Jones
- Re: "Michael has no chance"
- From: Ian Dalziel
- Re: "Michael has no chance"
- From: CatharticF1
- Re: "Michael has no chance"
- From: Ian Dalziel
- Re: "Michael has no chance"
- From: Phil Newnham
- RE: "Michael has no chance"
- Prev by Date: Re: So where the boody hell are you?
- Next by Date: Re: "Michael has no chance"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Michael has no chance"
- Next by thread: Re: "Michael has no chance"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|