Re: "Michael has no chance"

Ian Dalziel wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:20:44 +0000, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Ian Dalziel wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:09:29 GMT, CatharticF1 <eferrari@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

If you want to focus on collisions that appear deliberate between MS and Damon - turn the camera around at Silverstone and Monza next season. Because Damon's moves at both of those races were never going to result in anything but both drivers leaving the circuit.

Strangely they attract almost no attention.
Both pretty abysmal I agree - but where's the motive for doing them
deliberately?
If it was ok by the FIA when Michael did it...? Same reasoning as Senna again - if he's not playing fair, then neither shall I.

Senna and Schumacher got championships by doing it - Damon only got
gravel.

I can't see why those could be anything but botched overtakes.

True. But I seem to remember reading an article by Hill where he said he'd decided after Adelaide to be more aggressive... so maybe they were misguided aggression resulting in botched overtakes?

--
Phil

http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/31307.html
.