Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: David Melville <spamaway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:08:13 +1100
In article <1h9temu.16renz012j10a4N%ADDRESS@xxxxxx>, I believe
ADDRESS@xxxxxx said
> David Melville <spamaway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > They were added midstream to fix some other deficit, which doesn't not
> > > > necessarily make them advantageous, nor is the same as "they don't
> > > > work".
> > >
> > > You've seriously lost it: "They were added midstream to fix some other
> > > deficit, which doesn't not necessarily make them advantageous"?? So they
> > > fix a problem, but it's not advantageous - so they don't actually fix
> > > anything?? What point is it you're trying to make?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Graham
> > >
> > he means it was a band aid solution to a bigger problem intrinsic in the
> > design that could not be "fixed", so to speak, without a design
> > overhaul.
>
> Which is why they carried the "deficit" over to a brand new model, along
> with "the fix". Of course - it all makes sense.
>
I don't believe the argument. I was simply attempting to elucidate what
I believed the other poster to be saying.
Dave
.
- References:
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Phil Newnham
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Creamy Goodness
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Graham Hodgson
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Creamy Goodness
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Graham Hodgson
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Creamy Goodness
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Phil Newnham
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Creamy Goodness
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: Graham Hodgson
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- From: David Melville
- Re: McLaren's "horns"
- Prev by Date: Re: Tony Gaze honoured
- Next by Date: Re: McLaren's "horns"
- Previous by thread: Re: McLaren's "horns"
- Next by thread: Re: McLaren's "horns"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|