Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: "miker" <miker4butnospamok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:27:22 -0600
If something that
is not quite accurately programmed in happens, there goes the robot.
I do not call that intelligence, just repeating a drone.
I would say even the Turing test could be questioned, since it depends on
how smart the party being convinced is.
miker
.
- References:
- Question on protocol
- From: Chris D'Agnolo
- Re: Question on protocol
- From: Leon van Dommelen
- Re: Question on protocol
- From: pws
- Re: Question on protocol
- From: Leon van Dommelen
- Re: Question on protocol
- From: pws
- Re: Question on protocol
- From: Lanny Chambers
- Inevitable computer arguments (was: Re: Question on protocol) NMC
- From: pws
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments (was: Re: Question on protocol) NMC
- From: Chris D'Agnolo
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: pws
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: miker
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: pws
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: miker
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: pws
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: Eric Baber
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: XS11E
- Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- From: Leon van Dommelen
- Question on protocol
- Prev by Date: Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- Next by Date: Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- Previous by thread: Re: Inevitable computer arguments
- Next by thread: Re: Inevitable computer arguments (was: Re: Question on protocol) NMC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|