Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: dold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:28:32 +0000 (UTC)
Elle <elle_navorski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> <dold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> Does PG&E promote time-of-use metering for some other reason?
> I was thinking you were getting at time-of-use metering designed to
> preclude, say, brownouts in summer.
Same idea. We don't want to add generating capacity on an already hot day,
which in turn generates a little more daytime heat. (Tokyo supposedly has
a higher core city temperature and humidity because of the air conditioner
exhaust that results in measurably higher usage of air conditioning.)
The summer rates are .29 day and .086 night. I classify anything that PG&E
does to be for economic reasons, but in addition to that, I can see benefit
from spreading the load, and use the PG&E numbers as a guide to how
worthwhile they think it is to spread the load. The winter numbers are .11
and .089.
--
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5
.
- References:
- Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: Jason
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: jim beam
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: Abeness
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: jim beam
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: Abeness
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: jim beam
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: Abeness
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: jim beam
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: dold
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: Elle
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: dold
- Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- From: Elle
- Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- Prev by Date: Re: Air Conditioner Blows warm to hot air
- Next by Date: Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- Previous by thread: Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- Next by thread: Re: Dark Side of Hybrid Vehicles
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|