Re: Sloth Kills Fuel Economy!



Garth Almgren wrote:
Around 3/29/2008 12:22 PM, Scott in SoCal wrote:

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:05:22 -0800, "Daniel W. Rouse Jr."
<dwrousejr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So does driving over 3250 RPM in any gear when driving a fuel efficient
four-cylinder car, based on my observations of driving several four cylinder
cars including rental cars.


Wow, that's quite a conclusion there!

What, do you suppose, accounts for this 3250 RPM barrier, and why is
it the same for every fuel-efficient 4-cylinder engine? What RPM is
best for a non-fuel-efficient 4-cylinder engine (like the one in the
1973 Chevy Vega I used to have)? What about 6-, 8-, 10-, and
12-cylinder engines?


I can tell you right now, 3250 RPMs would put my V6 Mustang at almost 88 MPH, not its most efficient speed. The Mustang gets its best mileage at around 65 MPH and 2300 RPMs, and that's with a stone-age carb.

3250 RPMs in the Jeep which is a somewhat modern MPI 4 banger would put it at about 73 in 4th and 92 in overdrive, also not realistic speeds for fuel efficiency. 60 MPH (which is the slowest I can use overdrive) returns the highest MPG, and that's roughly 2100 RPMs.

So if you're just going to base it all on RPMs, my observations of my vehicles place the best point at an average 2200 RPMs or so.

BSFC is a much more important number than peak torque, IMO.


Sometimes - not always, but often enough that there seems to be some correlation - the lowest BSFC is at or near the torque peak.

nate

--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sloth Kills Fuel Economy!
    ... Nate Nagel wrote in ... cars including rental cars. ... I can tell you right now, 3250 RPMs would put my V6 Mustang at almost ... Rouse's RPM figure probably derives from the final gearing on his autos. ...
    (rec.autos.driving)
  • Re: OT: Is this music?
    ... These engines just blow me away. ... I think 20,000 RPMs is music. ... There is a giant difference between a F1 car and an Indy Car. ... the cars down, but the guys just keep going faster. ...
    (rec.music.makers.percussion)
  • Re: Sloth Kills Fuel Economy!
    ... cars including rental cars. ... best for a non-fuel-efficient 4-cylinder engine (like the one in the ... 88 MPH, ... and that's roughly 2100 RPMs. ...
    (rec.autos.driving)
  • Re: Sloth Kills Fuel Economy!
    ... cars including rental cars. ... best for a non-fuel-efficient 4-cylinder engine (like the one in the ... The Mustang gets its best mileage at around 65 MPH and 2300 RPMs, and that's with a stone-age carb. ... 3250 RPMs in the Jeep which is a somewhat modern MPI 4 banger would put it at about 73 in 4th and 92 in overdrive, also not realistic speeds for fuel efficiency. ...
    (rec.autos.driving)
  • Re: Part Numbers for 1994 Saturn Temperature Sensors
    ... DEM is Dana Engine Management, ... Remember to clear the codes after making repairs, ... ---The cruise control would work occasionally at first. ... RPMs became fairly high at around 1100-1200 RPM. ...
    (rec.autos.makers.saturn)