Re: The slippery slope is alive and well.

In article <1180968723.717383.22780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ed Pirrero wrote:
On Jun 4, 7:24 am, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@xxxxxxxxx (Brent P) wrote:
In article <1180960178.468189.29...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ed Pirrero wrote:
On Jun 3, 9:46 pm, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@xxxxxxxxx (Brent P) wrote:
In article <1180930730.490647.46...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ed Pirrero wrote:
How many confiscation laws do you have to presented with before you
realize they aren't all that isolated?
One or two or ten are isolated. When they happen EVERYWHERE, then you
might have a point. They don't, so you don't.

So your point is 'don't worry about it

Nope. But keep guessing.

That's the sum of what you post.

You must revel in being wrong. LOL.

You must revel in being a troll.

All kinds of folks believe stuff that's not true.
Why don't you prove this is false? Nahh... that's too much for you.
Asking for a logical impossibilty to prove your point? LOL. Weak,
even for you.

You're the one saying I'm wrong. You prove it.

Not the way it works. Those who make the orignal assertions must
prove them. Like I said, logic and reason...

I don't have to defend the assertions you imagine I made.

You are correct (for once). You only have to defend the assertions
you actually make.

Yet you expect me to defend the ones you imagine I made.

I see, you're just being a troll and want to change topics.
No, it's all part of a piece with the tin-foil-hatters. They are all
wrapped up in a big package. But nice non-address of the article.

It's off-topic Ed.

How incredibly ironic.

You should live by your own standards Ed.

Why? MFFY types like yourself believe that the "standards" don't
apply to them, so why not just join in?

I posted about driving... you bring in the north american union, and not
even the driving portion of it.

*At best* it's intellectual dishonesty. At worst, it's deliberate
misinformation.
Because you want to keep your head in the sand.
Ad hominem commentary doesn't prove your point.

Gee, don't like it flung back at you as usual Ed.

Non sequitur.

Back at ya.

Look up what "non sequitur" means - you obviously don't have a clue.

I have more of a clue than you do sand boy.

This story does not present the norm, or anything like it. Pretending
that everyone everywhere will soon be subject to this sort of thing is
tin-foil-hat thinking. Normal for Brent, but sad from anyone else.
I wasn't doing any such thing Ed.
Sure you are. The subject line shows your desperate attempt at spin,
however.
Because it's only happened in *some* places, it's not slippery slope to
you.
So now you admit you *were* doing "any such thing".
LOL.

If you ever used logic and reason, your head might explode. We'd all
be better off.

You're one of those people who won't learn until it happens to him.
Maybe you'll learn some day.
Yeah, Brent. Let's just say that I don't really think you or your ilk
somehow "know" so much more than everyone else, or that you possess
"the answers".

When this cancer gets to you, remember I warned you about it.

Another unfounded assuption.

That's right, the walls of your bubble will stop it.... not being aware
of these things and being able to fight it when someone proposes it in
your area.

But keep pretending - it's amusing to watch.

You just enjoy being unaware and uninformed.

So, this is tantamount to admitting that your posts on the topic have
zero value. You've been attempting for years to inform and make me
aware of these issues, and yet, I still am not buying your line of
crap. Oh, that's right - you know so much more than anyone else that
it must be *me* that's the problem. LOL.

Why do you think it's all about you Ed? Here's a hint, it's not. Talk
about MFFY....

You don't want to see what
is going on because it disturbs your idea of reality.

No, I don't see what's going on because it actually hasn't been proven
that anything is actually going on.

The laws are just being passed for fun, right Ed? They aren't actually
going to use them... Ed trusts government not to be evil. Ed ignores
thousands of years of history to stay in his bubble of denial.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Long time......
    ... What I did was defend him against every underhanded homophobic attack ... LOL Well if they want them they can ... labs from work. ... the treatments are curing you, ...
    (alt.med.fibromyalgia)
  • Re: OT: Administration needs training
    ... Um, Sugar? ... Do you really mean to defend 2pid? ... the majority of his posts? ... LoL. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: Contact video featured on Youtube
    ... Funny to see that when a juggling video is featured, ... is it a bubble? ... ..that last one made me lol:). ...
    (rec.juggling)
  • Re: Contact video featured on Youtube
    ... Funny to see that when a juggling video is featured, ... is it a bubble? ... ..that last one made me lol:). ... You laugh at it whilst you said it is crystal or glass... ...
    (rec.juggling)
  • Re: Long time......
    ... What I did was defend him against every underhanded homophobic attack ... LOL Well if they want them they can join ... No secret as I have posted that I unlike most can run my own labs from ... my ex called John after I did. ...
    (alt.med.fibromyalgia)
Loading