Re: Following Distance
- From: Stabilized <blogbuster99@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Apr 2007 21:36:35 -0700
I'm not sure how to judge the distance by the number of seconds.
What I've learnt was to keep a distance of minimum 2-3 cars in
case of emergency...
______________________________________
Free Tips to Save Car Gas Bill & Much More
@ www.HowCanISaveMoney.com/tips03.htm
Get Any eBook for Free
@ http://tinyurl.com/2uunnx
On Apr 20, 1:45 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Back when I was learning to drive, the recommended following distance
(with good weather and visibility) was 2 seconds. That was back when we
all drove cars with bias ply tires, drum brakes and shitty suspensions.
A few years ago, I saw something put out by 'experts' recommending a
three second following rule. I just wrote that off to the general
descent of the median driving population into old age dementia and the
legislature's unwillingness to do anything about it.
Now, the state patrol is publicizing their effort to crack down on
tailgating. The mentioned that the recommended following distance is now
4 seconds.
Aside from the obvious loosening of the acceptable minimal driving
standards, do they realize what impact this has on the carrying capacity
of the highway system?
</end of rant>
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:P...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
Happily doing the work of 3 Men ... Moe, Larry & Curly
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Following Distance
- From: Harry K
- Re: Following Distance
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Following Distance
- References:
- Following Distance
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Following Distance
- Prev by Date: Re: Certified Former Rental below Blue Book Value - worth it? Or other options.
- Next by Date: Re: Following Distance
- Previous by thread: Re: Following Distance
- Next by thread: Re: Following Distance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|