Re: SPP and the Trans Texas Corridor

On Mar 27, 3:56 pm, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@xxxxxxxxx (Brent P)
wrote:
In article <1175032906.919191.96...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ed Pirrero wrote:
Really? Scott never posts the sheer volume of political bull*** you
do.

shear volume... Prove it ed.

I would estimate that over 40% of your posts contain *some* political
component.

And you never miss an opportunity to make some claim about government
gone bad.

Maybe instead of letting 90% of them slide, I'll comment on *every
single one*. How about that?


Hell not even Judy delves into the black helicopter crap like
you.

I've never delved into 'black helicopter crap'.

Dude, that's all you're about. Hell, I don't think you even drive, do
you?

take over of roads
No. Doesn't matter who owns them.

That's laughable. If I owned the road in front of your house I wouldn't
allow you to drive upon it. Does it make a difference to you now?

Only if you were actually allowed to do that. But you're not, and so
no, no difference.

An RLC
with a short yellow is just really a tax for using the road.
The government implications are meaningless to driving. The safety
issue is directly related.

[non-answer snipped]

Of course, you never address the substantive point...

I really don't think they want to deal with transportation issues.
The SPP and the NAU and the Amero are not driving issues, no matter
how much you claim they are.

That big network of roads....

What big network of roads? An exaggeration, to be charitable. And,
to point out the obvious, the SPP, NAU and Amero have nothing to do
with roads. Especially the latter two.

Or maybe, like the moon-landing doubters, you're exactly right. Or
those folks who claim to be abducted by aliens. Or those folks who
think the U.N. is gonna take all their guns.

Nice try Ed.

It's no try - those folks fervently believe they are 100% correct. I
see no substative difference between them and you. Logically or
intellectually.

I noticed something, everytime I cite something...

If your cites were worth anything, then I'd discuss them.

But they rarely are. Just like the one at the start of this thread,
that has very little to do with actual driving.

Even when they are worth something, they are very often off-topic,
thus worthless in r.a.d.

You want discussion on your pet political issues? Post your crap in a
political newsgroup, mark it OT here, and link it. Then those who
care can go over and read it.

But here's the real beauty for an admitted troll such as yourself - if
you don't like my replies to your politcal bull***, you could choose
to activate your filters.

Otherwise, you'll just have to put up with my pestering you to not
post political crap to r.a.d.

E.P.

.