Re: MFFY du jour


gpsman wrote:
N8N wrote: <brevity snip>
gpsman wrote:
Drivers who have the most problems with traffic are not good drivers.

So you've never seen a driver in the fast lane pacing traffic to his
right with a half mile or more of clear road in front of him? where
it's impossible to pass on the right?

Of course I have... kinda. But I've never seen the path to the R
permanently blocked... and I didn't say I'd never seen an LLB, just
that I find them rare.

Cuz yer in MT, moron.

Try it in some urban center. It happens ALL THE TIME. Traffic piles
up behind.

I don't keep a running tally but I believe most LLBs are *old* folks
scared to death at the way people drive and so occupy the L lane in
defense, and the *only* defense available to them.

Well, then you have *** for brains.

1.) If old folks can't obey KRETP, or are scared of traffic, they
should get the hell off the road.
2.) Your observation skills suck. Most of the LLBs I see are
minivan/Subaru drivers.

..perhaps against
those who feel the proper way to enter a freeway is as fast as
possible.

Spurious conclusion. Very few of those folks exist. The slothy 35mph
folks are in the vast majority.

In the L lane they are most protected from the drivers who
operate like Scott in his video. They can only be cut-off from one
direction.

So, it's not OK to break one law, but OK to break another? You're an
idiot.

So ISTM many instances of LLBing are reactions to bad driving.

Spurious conclusion.

And you don't consider that
dangerous, or consider that to be detrimental to smooth traffic flow?

If you can't get around, in your scenerio above, it seems to me that
traffic must be flowing smoothly, just not at the higher velocity you
would prefer.

Spurious conclusion. Traffic is BUNCHED UP, e-tard. Not smooth, but
knotted in clumps, caused by LLBs pacing cars in the RH lane.

How could LLBing be dangerous? I think it could only be considered
dangerous behavior if it is dangerous in a "no traffic" situation.

Spurious conclusion. See above.

After all, if it is not dangerous to operate at 85mph how could it be
dangerous to operate at lower and legal velocity?

Proximity to other vehicles is the primary danger, not absolute
velocity.

PMSman, you really are a moron. No better than your previous nym,
Midnight Dud, errr, Dad.

E.P.

.

Quantcast