Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- From: DTJ <None@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:56:37 -0500
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 02:15:15 -0800, floyd@xxxxxxxxxx (Floyd L.
Davidson) wrote:
Sigh. Another retarded liberal post to dispute.
The Republican congressmen are at it again: they are talking DRILLING
IN ALASKA'S WILDLIFE REFUGE FOR OIL.
The part of ANWR they want to drill in is a barren wasteland.
That is an absurdly ridiculous statement.
Really. Tell us oh great one exactly why it is not a wasteland. I
would ask you to tell us why it is not barren, except that point is
not in dispute.
The drill rigs will take up a miniscule portion of land area,and not
More false statements.
Well I guess you are right. Nobody considers a 1/4 acre as minuscule.
Most of us consider it insignificantly minuscule.
interfere with wildlife,JUST like the present drilling areas.
We have 30+ years of biology studies, all funded by oil money and
all intended to find ways to increase oil production, which show
otherwise.
Bull ***.
And they already have proven they can drill up there and be environmentally
sound.
Where is that proof?
Show us proof otherwise. Oh yeah, there isn't any.
I don't want to hear the Rush or some other idiot who writes
Plonkity plonk plonk, another retard hits the bit bucket.
*************************
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- References:
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- Prev by Date: Re: I accelerated quickly from the lights and saved time
- Next by Date: Re: "Passing on Right" in Maryland
- Previous by thread: Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- Next by thread: Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- Index(es):