Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- From: floyd@xxxxxxxxxx (Floyd L. Davidson)
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 02:15:15 -0800
Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jackie <ravina@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:Xns97B3B2CA1DE72asdf32123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
The Republican congressmen are at it again: they are talking DRILLING
IN ALASKA'S WILDLIFE REFUGE FOR OIL.
The part of ANWR they want to drill in is a barren wasteland.
That is an absurdly ridiculous statement.
The drill rigs will take up a miniscule portion of land area,and not
More false statements.
interfere with wildlife,JUST like the present drilling areas.
We have 30+ years of biology studies, all funded by oil money and
all intended to find ways to increase oil production, which show
otherwise.
And they already have proven they can drill up there and be environmentally
sound.
Where is that proof?
I don't want to hear the Rush or some other idiot who writes
opinions without facts has said it is. I want you to point out
the actual proof. Show a study by scientist using field work done
on the North Slope that came up with data demonstrating what you
have claimed is fact.
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@xxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- From: DTJ
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- References:
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- Prev by Date: Re: Thank An Enviromentalist / Democrat
- Next by Date: Re: What some carry in their cars
- Previous by thread: Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- Next by thread: Re: IS DRILLING A SOLUTION?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|